“I should like to consider the folk song, and expound briefly on a theory I have held for some time, to the effect that the reason most folk songs are so atrocious is that they were written by the people.” — Tom Lehrer
I too have a theory that I’ve held for some time, that I’d also like to expound briefly on.
It is this: that economic conservatives and social liberals are natural allies, despite usually appearing in the platforms of the two main opposing parties, as are economic liberals with social conservatives.
Why is this?
Because more than anything else, social liberalism correlates with societal wealth, in the sense of cheapness of goods relative to your income. In the fulsome, fatuous old Victorian phrase, if you can take care of the basics– food, warmth, shelter, entertainment– your mind “turns to higher things”. Or if you’re like me and prefer more modern formulations (and mixed metaphors, which are goofy fun), it would be that a rising tide lifts all boats higher up on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
That, of course, is only half of it. The other half is that economic liberalism in large quantities– the ability and inclination of voters to vote themselves someone else’s money– kills economies. Always. Like strychnine or nitroglycerin, which in small amounts are useful (as appetite inducer and heart stimulant, respectively), that which is fine in small amounts is fatal in large quantities. (Sola dosis facit venenum, as Paracelsus said.) The most isolated such economies offer the most vivid examples, such as Venezuela, where the societal wealth, the cheapness of goods, has vanished.
Thus it is that unrestrained economic liberalism kills the societal wealth that allows social liberalism to flourish. Venezuela has never been anyone’s idea of Berkeley, but surely it must be an even more socially conservative place right now. Single-minded social conservatives should therefore want less societal wealth. None are that single-minded, of course, but for the reason that is at the core of my theory, and which is at the core of many political problems: economic desires frequently conflict with social desires. In this case, the strong support of conservatives for economic freedom hinders their desire for social conservatism, by creating the wealth that enables people to be more socially liberal.